| English |
|
|
| |
My work involves dealings with
the Australian National Electricity Market, and our
Marketing team at Macquarie Generation require up to
date reliable information 24 * 7. I have been able to
provide this over a period of several years thanks to
Powerbuilder. I owe my career to this product. Thankyou. |
|
| |
I think Powerbuilder is a excellent
product. Even though PB has not made any changes in
the last 3 orr 4 years that have help me much, I have
been able to continue producing great programs that
complete very well against my web based competition.
But I think Sybase needs to deliver improvements soon.
So I am looking forward to the new PB look & the integration
with .NET. |
|
| |
Make sure Appeon stays aligned
with the changes made in PowerBuilder. |
|
| |
after 10 years of using PB i have
taken my first classes. It's amaizing how much there
is to the product. We intend to increase our use of
PB because of it's ability to multi-deploy. We can have
clientserver apps and web apps from the same development
efforts. Clientserver is alive and well out here. Your
first question is presuming that PB is obsolete. I've
had PB since v2 I have never seen a product progressivly
enhanced thru so many industry changes. It's technology
has been updated from a simple clientserver development
tool to OO and now sophisticated web support. PB is
Sybases best kept secret. (there marketing department
needs to wake up!) |
|
| |
Its a great product but is not
marketed well. |
|
| |
We are fairly comfortable with
how Powerbuilder works and meets our needs. Our biggest
problem is finding developers in our area. And your
market strength, seems to be dwindling, so we have moved
to a C++ environment. |
|
| |
For the improvements above, here
is my priority: 1) .NET 2) GUI 3) PowerScript 4) XML
5) Web Services 6) NVUO |
|
| |
pb was great for its time, but
mergersacquisitions, lack of technical focusclarity,
have caused us to go find other options long ago for
new apps. doubtful we will ever return to pb, though
never say never |
|
| |
The best tool out there, but quickly
losing market share. |
|
| |
PB is still the best development
environment that I have ever worked with! I now do class
ASP and .NET, night and day difference as with the newer
technologies it hard to do things in a standardized
fashion as there is 1000000's of way to accomplish a
task! Think about it ASP ASP.0, Javascript, Ajax, HTML,
C#, StoredProcedures, and each of these technologies
have a HUGE breadth. It's takes forever to learn the
new technologies and by the time you do learn it there
is a newer version that is different! Oh I miss the
day of setting a transaction object and performing a
dw_1.Retrieve()! |
|
| |
Version 9.xx is buggy |
|
| |
PB Datawindow still crushes all
other objects for complex reporting. Fast, flexible
and easiest build wSQL back end. If PB does not integrate
well with Web in future then maybe, maybe, maybe we
might look into EclipseBIRT to replace it. |
|
| |
The best web & CS tool |
|
| |
PB is way too far behind on the
technology curve as well as the GUI curve. Customer
demand has necessitated us migrating to VS2005. |
|
| |
Mixed feelings about PB. On the
one hand no one comes close to its RAD capabilities,
ease-of-use, and almost bugfree apps that can be created
with it. But its inablility to be fully integrated with
.NET is a major drawback. Back in the old days, PB kept
lockstep with Microsoft technologies. But starting with
the the COM revolution it got left behind. So we have
been converting to .NET for some time. |
|
| |
Market forces are a greater determinant
in our direction of which tools to use than actual functionality.
I hate trying to get dot net datagrids to give me the
functionality I have had for years with Powerbuilder. |
|
| |
1. PB is sometimes crashing out
of sudden especially when it has been running for a
while or to click 'Hideshow prototype to see arguments
in functions and so on. It causes bigsmall loss of programming
changes. This is the major drawback in working wPB.
We can's save changes every minute. 2. As we plan to
develop web application in near future, we need good
reference to look at. How can we get that? |
|
| |
I think you are falling behind
in the graphical UI department. It has been requested
for years, but you still can't drop a transparent object
(static text, group box, etc.) onto a window. So, trying
to create a look like gradient windows or any of the
fancier looks is very difficult. Please spend some time
giving us controls with more functionality. |
|
| |
The Webservice support for .net
2 will be important for our team. PBDOM xml needs to
be able to create a xml output other than a file. A
blob or string is necessary. FILE IO is a show stopper.
We use uNoksoft XML parser and not PBDOM. As far as
development goes, our team is growing and Major Application
Sections will be written with PB. |
|
| |
I wish Sybase would add resources
to the development and marketing of PB. |
|
| |
It would be really nice to have
PB objects and components compile to MSIL. More to the
point: a true PB.NET"." |
|
| |
We are interested in PowerBuilder's
evolution and their marketing plan to sell this product
in the future. |
|
| |
I still love the tool - but the
marketing hasn't gone so well in Sybase. Our company
is large and an enterprise-wide initiative has forced
us to replace all existing PB apps with J2EE JAVA applications
(browser-based). |
|
| |
Very productive tool, that would
be improved by further integration with .Net framework
and servers |
|
| |
Sometimes too many GPF's occur
during developmentdeployment without any clear indication
of the source of the problem. I wish PB was as stable
as Visual Studio. It would be good for PB to (not necessarily
in order of importance): 1. implement resizing of controls
at design-time on an object to which they are attached
when the object is resized 2. reflect, at design-time,
visual attribute changes on visual custom objects at
design time. 3. re-implement the proxy object. 4. have
an in-built resource manager for images, sound files,
etc. This would take away a lot of frustration when
deploying a project and you want to organize resource
in different folders. Regards. |
|
| |
Very good tools for what it does.
Unfortunately the market is driving us to open source
web developement. |
|
| |
PB server as a RAD tool. It can
be improved, but if it was perfect Microsoft would buy
it. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder serves our clientserver
application excellently. It is an excellent rapid applications
development and OOP develpment tool. On technology enhancement,
additional XML enhancement could serve us well, including
WEB Services integration. Note that we are an EAServer
user developing those applications in JAVA, but using
some components from the PB clientserver interface. |
Top |
| |
Given a knowledgeable PowerBuilder
developer, a clientserver application can be created
quicker and with the most features compared to any other
clientserver development tool available. The key is
to find somebody who has good programming techniques
and understands the concept of modularity and object
oriented design within their applications. |
|
| |
Although I am only maintaining
old applications written in powerbuilder I still believe
that it is a very good tool. Currently our department
buys already developed applications so we are no longer
doing our own development except using the tools provided
with the purchased package. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder is the most productive
application development tool I have used in my 25 years
of programming |
|
| |
I personally enjoy working in Powerbuilder
and have for 10 years. However, our company has a very
small IT shop and has decided to go .NET. I hope to
investigate the possibility of using DataWindow.NET
but have not yet done so. |
|
| |
I have been developing apps with
PB since version 3.0 and have made a good living using
PB. It would be really nice if Sybase would work on
getting the platform really stable instead of changing
icons on the ide and calling it a new release. Granted
Sybase has incorporated a lot of new features and functionality
but every contract that I have been on and working with
PB the standard answer when something occurs thats just
Powerbuilder"" |
|
| |
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK. LONG LIVE
POWERBUILDER. |
|
| |
Using it for 8 years, still learning
its features. |
|
| |
Best RAD I ever worked with. |
|
| |
Moving off PB and moving to .NET |
|
| |
Unfortunately, PB didn't make it.
It will slowly be vanished and replaced by fat on the
market" technologies. PB is now a niche, which poses
risk to large enterprize developments." |
|
| |
PowerBuilder will be more dead
than it is now. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder is the best tool in
it's class. |
|
| |
We love PowerBuilder. It has served
our organization very well. We are considering expanding
our use of the product in other divisions of our company.
However, there are two areas that are really hurting
us that I'd like to mention: 1. Your lack of marketing
for PowerBuilder creates huge problems for us in terms
of recruiting as well as our customers' perception of
our technology. I'm getting tired of defending Sybase
and your products to the community. You need to take
responsibility for getting your success stories out
there. 2. Since you wrote your own memory manager (after
PB7), our customers have struggled mightily in terms
of memory consumption. You create an object then destroy
it, you don't get your memory back. You introduced PB_POOL_THRESHOLD
environment variable for backwards compatibility with
your old memory manager but from what we can tell, it
doesn't work. You really, really need to fix this. If
we destroy an object, we need the capability of getting
the memory back immediately. Please, please fix this.
|
|
| |
PB is probably the most powerful
language out there. It is sad that they are letting
Microsoft squash them. We switched to C# for new development
mainly because we needed grid tools PB was not providing.
But everything takes so much longer! |
|
| |
Our primary goal in 2006 will be
to deploy the Russian version of our primary billing
application in Russia. PB 10 provided the Unicode support
to convert our program from a single language to a multi-linqual
application and, at the moment, we have no plans to
develop any Web apps using PB (we currently use ASP
for all of our web programming). |
|
| |
The company is split into two divisions.
These answers are from just my division. The other division
has more developers and will be sending you there information. |
|
| |
If only we can convert PB apps
and not tie them to EA Server, it will be great. |
|
| |
I wonder what the future of PowerBuilder
would be if it was moved to open source. As it is, my
current client is migrating away from it :( |
|
| |
Go .NET or bust! |
|
| |
Poor Sybase has never attempted
to even market PowerBuilder. What a shame that such
a good development tool, hasn't had any marketing in
years. |
|
| |
The Marmeting group at Sybase need
to seriously market PB10g in a better way than earlier.
PB lost its charm after Poersoft sold the company, mainly
because of marketing! And eventually the developer community
was hit. Bad marketing shopuld not cause harm to Developer
Community. Sybase corporation is also hit by this bad
marketing in the past. |
Top |
| |
Needs good marketing. PB would
have been no 1 tool, if Microsoft had bought! |
|
| |
PB is not very popular in Quebec. |
|
| |
The development evironment can
be unstable if the target is tool large. Also the handling
of Window GUI objects can be trouble some to handle.
I like the tight" integration with Oracle database" |
|
| |
If it works, and from what I hear
it does, I don't understand why they don't push APPEON
more. We're almost afraid to touch it, even though it
could help us, because lack of marketing translates
to lack of confidence. What is up with their MARKETING?
Powerbuilder is a great product, but they hide it under
a bush. |
|
| |
Final Exe build size reduction
or run time library avaialability on th web like Java
run time when the user clicks on a PB app. Better integration
woth PLSQL (like creating a dw based on a ref cursor
(out) etc) Better UNICODE support for multi-lingula
apps |
|
| |
Would like to hear more information
about the future and what is new with powerbuilder. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder is good programming
language and should be marketed more aggressively. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder is great, but I wish
that Sybase would aggressively market it, because as
a developer it is hard to find work as a PB developer;
most companies have never heard of it, and it makes
it hard to stay excited about the long term prospects
of being a PB developer! |
|
| |
I am the only application developer
in my company that still uses Powerbuilder. Microsoft
.Net is now the preferred software of choice. I will
be maintaining current applications in Powerbuilder
only. |
|
| |
Due to the lack of linux support,
we plan on moving to the Eiffel development environment.
|
|
| |
Deleting ancestor menu items is
still a pain in the butt. Why doesn't the PFC ever evolve? |
|
| |
To improve PB's acceptance as a
development tool, Sybase needs to try mainstreaming
this product. Push universities to use PB to teach Object
Oriented Programing concepts. |
|
| |
GUI of developed programs could
use updating. Tighter integration with .NET (NOT just
DataWindow .NET). More programming like useage--less
dependence on objects in design environment. Creation
of a variable for a menu associated with a Window to
allow manipulation versus manipulation of the ONE created. |
|
| |
We are waiting for PowerBuilder
10.5 to be released. We hope that Sybase will keep the
promise to implement Web Service Proxy Client with digital
cert. |
|
| |
I really loved Powerbuilder as
a development tool, unfortunately as a consultant, my
clients, if they even use Powerbuilder, only use it
for exisitngmaintaining applications, not new development.
To have a more advancing career and not be stuck in
maintenance mood, I have needed to focus my skills towards
other development tools just as .Net. I would love Powerbuilder
to have a strong comeback some day. |
|
| |
Improve stability and reliability |
|
| |
I have earned my bread and butter
being a Powerbuilder Developer for 10 years. I am indebted
to Powerbuilder. It is such a great user friendly tool. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder is definitely a nice
tool to work with DataBasee. But when it comes to the
matter of developing Web based applications it lacks
a bit compare to giants like Java and .Net. I personally
except some more advanced features in powerbuilder as
far as Web based applications are concerned. |
|
| |
PB is a strong tool, we hope it
continues to survive. .Net support is a non issue for
us. Java and PHP support as well as Linux is important. |
|
| |
PB 10 very unstable |
|
| |
Sybase devrait faire plus d’efforts
pour supporter PowerBuiler en France. En tant que développeur
PowerBuilder nous voulons plus de support en français
(informations techniques, forums, formations...), plus
de communication autour de PowerBuilder (conférences,
informations et même publicités…) pour dynamiser le
marché du développement sous PowerBuilder. |
Top |
| |
I think Powerbuilder will become
a no longer used product unless Sybase concentrates
on two things: 1. Ability to transparently move an existing
Application to the web. 2. Do a better job at Marketing,
I never hear much about activities concerning Powerbuilder,
at least in Houston. Must a forgotten city. |
|
| |
Falta mejorar la parte de desarrollo
web |
|
| |
PB while once an excellent product
has fallen so far behind the times it is virtually useless.
PB 9.0 is so buggy and crashes so often it is extrememly
frustrating to use. All of his can't wait till we migrate
all of our apps to .NET. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder is becoming the Legacy
tool. |
|
| |
Product advt is required |
|
| |
PB is excellent product for client-server.
Still not there to my liking for web apps, and I'm quite
concerned that it never will be. DW.net (v1.5) is so
full of holes and has such a ludicrous amount of overhead
(including the temporary files created on the server
that don't ever get cleaned up). I had a simple one-page
app that took an awful lot of workarounds just to get
running. So many, that I abandoned dw.net and went back
to Cold Fusion. |
|
| |
A very flexible tool with a moderate
to easy learning curve for building interesting, detailed
and functional Client Server applications and Web Reports. |
|
| |
We have had great success using
Appeon to convert our PB applications to run on the
Web! |
|
| |
Though PowerBuilder has been and
still is the best RAD tool, it's marketing has been
very poor. Current trend has been towards maintaining
existing applications and moving out to microsoft tools.
A better Marketing strategy is a must for PowerBuilder
to survive. |
|
| |
Sybase needs to be leading the
curve with PowerBuilder in technology NOT following
it. They need to make it a strategic advantage to use
PowerBuilder over .NET otherwise, why use PowerBuilder
since we now have DW .NET. |
|
| |
Will PB 11's C# emitter save PowerBuilder
from the clientserver graveyard? That is the question.
The ability to easily integrate existing PB code with
C# will be a major determining factor for us. |
|
| |
Still an outstanding and productive
tool. Too bad it's also one of computing's most misused
tools. There is a lot of horrible PowerBuilder code
out there. |
|
| |
There's nothing particularly wrong
with the product - but I NEVER see any marketing for
it.... |
|
| |
We use Appeon for PowerBuilder
for Web Enablement and new Web Development. |
|
| |
Mgt here is sold on Microsoft .Net
so it is a challenge to get them to even upgrade our
PB version as we've been stuck on PB7 for yrs. |
|
| |
Need ability to generate nonvisual
service objects in .Net ASAP. Don't want to wait for
full visual .net implementation. |
|
| |
Love using Powerbuilder, just sad
that management does not see how valuable it is. We
will still be using it for at least the next 2 years,
but after that, who knows? |
|
| |
Please improve client-server functionalities
and minimize web integration development |
|
| |
Powerbuilder foundation classes
has to be documented and to be made more structured
like .net classes. PB also should give us the opportunity
to write classes and thereby GUI's will be generated.
In a one page all GUI script classes should be displayed.
this makes classes to be read in original way. |
|
| |
Web development should be user
friendly and should support IIS web deployement with
datawindow compatibility. |
|
| |
I've been laid off from (PB) work
because my ex-company decided to outsourced software
development to India. |
|
| |
There never was anything quite
like PowerBuilder a decade ago and there is nothing
quite like it even today. Web DataWindow is an excellent
technology that needs to further include all native
client DW functionality by supporting other events and
user defined buttons. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder has been a stable
development evironment for years. I would like to use
.NET but still use PowerScript to access all the .NET
api call. |
|
| |
Sybase takes too long to deliver
for the developers. You can spot a PowerBuilder 10.5
Application from the International Space Station. We're
leaving PowerBuilder for Microsoft Visual Studio 2005.
Sybase has run the product into the ground. |
|
| |
Well, I love working with powerbuilder
in the past 4 years, but when I know about .Net, I said
to myself, Microsoft will any other competitor in the
same intrest, like PB, Flash (with xaml) ... Unless
they struggle to keep their market boundry, for my opinion
Datawindow.net was a succesful move from sybase, but
there are may area need evolving ... Thanks and best
regards |
|
| |
Great tool to help application
building. |
|
| |
Though PB is a powerful tool, Why
is n't so popular as other tools? |
|
| |
PB is the best Windows development
tool still. But it is not a preferred web development
platform. |
Top |
| |
We missed the web curve ! We are
about missing the mobile curve with PKB too... Still
waiting for the .NET integration. And many customers
are migrating to Java. It's high time that Sybase fought
back in PB... |
|
| |
Enjoy working with the product. |
|
| |
Make the license less expensive. |
|
| |
It is behind in the visual presentation
for menus, tabs and graphs. |
|
| |
In my opinion, PowerBuilder is
still a strong development tool. However, Sybase hurt
the product some years ago when it attempted to concentrate
on consulting instead of improving the product. I would
love to see a stronger push by the company to market
it's multi-platform development abilities. In the industry,
PowerBuilder is seen as a dying development tool and
not a growing one. I don't know if this perspective
can be reversed. |
|
| |
Estoy interesado en conocer e interartuar
con el desarrolo de aolicaciones en powerbuilder, si
me pueden hacr llegar una licencia demo y alguns ejemplos
para desarrollarlos y poder visualizar la funcionalidad
de la herramienta. Muchas gracias por su colaboracion.
Alvaro Montoya C. amontoya@comfama.com.co |
|
| |
Needs an overhaul in several areas.
For instance, debugging (data windows especially). Another:
Why do PBDs exist? In the presence of source control
systems, they have no positive function at all. |
|
| |
PB definetely, great RAD tool to
work with, stands tall from a developer prespective
(atleast for me), but couldn't impress my clients. everybody
knows VB is, when I say PB, soon the question arises,
what is PB ? nowadays most of developers are moving
out of PB, and hard to find a good PB resource. |
|
| |
We are not getting PB material
(like PB Books etc...) |
|
| |
Marketing by Sybase required more.
|
|
| |
sdkgqsgklmlk |
|
| |
I love PB and support it for more
than 10 years. I also love PFC. That's why I want you
to change your mind about PFC open source support. It
is not only a script library but also proves the power
of PowerBuilder and Datawindow. Thanks. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder needs the following:
Rich text edit style for datawindows. Fade and blend
effects for all objects datawindow controls. Ability
to create polygons in datawindows. If it had the above,
I would give it a 10 instead of an 8! |
|
| |
need stronger emphasis on Java
support (over .NET) + better graphics and stronger,
more consistent internationalisation support (right-to-left,
mirroring, fonts, calendar) alongside Unicode |
|
| |
No comments this year ! So far
so good ! |
|
| |
My life would be miserable without
the datawindow :) |
|
| |
PB is a strong tool, wishes more
people would use it instead of .net |
|
| |
Hope one day Multilingual ascpect
will be within powerbuilder (actualy we use the Translation
tool kit, but the tool is not good enough for a big
application). |
|
| |
Datawindow (XML) improvements |
|
| |
While I still have a high regard
for core (client-server) PB functionality, it has never
convinced with its wider offerings. While I am sad to
give it up personally, it is losing ground in my company
and I think it's best hope is in .NET integration. |
Top |
| |
On moving from PB 6.5 to 9, mostly
it has been a major improvement, but there are some
let-downs. When an object goes from invisible to visible,
it is now disabled, for example. Also some things are
hard to find. |
|
| |
I love PB so much that, I just
hate to code with other tools! |
|
| |
During our 5 years of development
in Powerbuilder, we have have repeatly come up againest
Flaws, issues or restrictions placed on us by Powerbuilder.
The IDE has proven to be unstable, and we've suffered
countless times from our Application behaving differently
when compiled to when its tested from within the IDE. |
|
| |
Goodbye PowerBuilder... you are
clinging on for dear life, but your nails are slipping
towards the edge. It's been a ride. You won't be missed.
FATAL ERROR! Powerbuilder will now close. |
|
| |
I am leaving this company to become
consulting independent. |
|
| |
We have now used PB since 1993
and are very pleased. The best tool in the world. |
|
| |
Please focus on the desktop capabilities
and forget about all this WEB stuff (except the internetResult
object). In my company we use PowerBuilder as a thin
client communicationg to a WEB server via the internetResult
object, and it works just great. |
|
| |
Lot of bugs ... |
|
| |
I would like know all on integration
of PB and Web. |
|
| |
Mostly using Powerbuilder for our
older clientserver legacy systems. |
|
| |
The world has become very confusing
with all sorts of web technologies. Gotta be web enabled!
Why? Whats wrong with standard client server? We have
built large bespoke long standing client-server applications
that are ever growing. The paranoia about moving to
web" can have a very negative impact on an otherwise
very viable standard client server application. Moving
to EAServer just seems like more complexity of the environment." |
|
| |
Needs money, resources, marketing.
Needs money, resources, marketing. Needs money, resources,
marketing. Needs money, resources, marketing.... |
|
| |
First off, please do not drop support
of PowerBuilder, I still believe that it is the best
client-server application development environment around.
Even .NET does not compare. On that note, I think improvements
in it's integration with other tools and also low-level
enhancements (like user defined enumerations, and possibly
also bit level operations) would be very beneficial.
Recently, I had to implement the AES encryption algorythm
for a client, and had no choice but to resort to using
Visual C++ to implement a DLL for external calling by
PB because PB could not run the algorythm fast enough
because of the lack of bitwise manipulations in PB.
We love the datawindow here, there is nothing better.
The .NET datagrid simply does not compare, and any improvements
to the datawindow.net control would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks |
|
| |
Need better graphing, especially
ability to choose color order of linesseries. Ability
to write to pdf without ghostscript third party tool.
Even better, ability to export reports to MS Word. |
Top |
| |
PowerBuilder is rapidly losing
it's appeal. Microsoft .NET is the better tool and priced
correctly. Sybase continues to do a poor job in pricing
and marketing it's product. In addition, PowerBuilder
developers are hard to find, which makes the product
less appealing. |
|
| |
From the point of marketing, Sybase
didn't bother to market a good product, instead focusing
on mobile wireless computing. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder is dying a slow death
due to Sybase's failure to market the product. Sybase
apparently sees integration with Microsoft as a way
to enhance the product, but beta testers do not concur.
PowerBuilder 10.5 is weak to say the least, doesn't
have significant upgrades, and is like PB10, very little
for most customers to choose from. Like General Motors,
PowerBuilder's demise is inevitable UNLESS Sybase actually
puts some effort into improving the product. While PB
still is the best and most enjoyable development tool
to use, it definitely needs a major overhaul to get
it back to the top or even into contention again. |
|
| |
With Windows Vista just around
the corner, PowerBuilder should be planning right now,
to prevent a repeat with what happend with Windows XP. |
|
| |
powerbuilder is great..! |
|
| |
There should be a better plan towards
the future. The talk abould discontinuation gets very
annoying. A decision to stop or to continue makes is
a lot easier to plan for the future. |
|
| |
More stability of PB is requestednecessary! |
|
| |
PowerBuilder has great potential
but suffers from strange marketing decisions like the
ones about distributed componants, added, removed, replaced
by another solutions with costs... Sybase should listen
more to PB devs, who keeps PB alive and adress old knowns
bugs an irregularities in PB. |
|
| |
We need urgently connection from
PocketBuilder to MSSQLServer!!! It would also help to
have direct connection to EA Server. |
|
| |
Problems with components in EAServer
when using database access should be solved. The alternative
is bind the object to one CPU ans ocassionally fails. |
|
| |
We are missing a 'indenter' for
script: after copiing script fro another script, we
need to reindenter the whole script |
|
| |
PB 9.0 build 8565, no es una versión
estable se cae continuamente, la integración con SCC,
es compleja. |
|
| |
Marketing should be strenghen,I
can not say more,powerbuilder marketing is a mess, we
hope sybase take the dealership from BlueExpress，and
more free trainning should be offered |
|
| |
Long Life to PB! |
|
| |
For a while, I was worried PB was
fading away. Now, I use it at work, I contract using
it, and I'm writing my own software with it. PB10.5
enhancements are exciting, but PB11 looks to be AWESOME.
Anything Sybase can do to allow me to program in PB
but distribute it in various ways is appreciated. |
Top |
| |
It is still the most comprehensive
and productive tool for developing CS applications and
can be a wonderful tool for developing web applications
regardless of which web architecture is employed....what
is seriously missing is a push from Sybase regarding
marketing and resources. |
|
| |
Starting working with WebDataWindowControl
(using ASP.NET and DataWindow.NET 1.5), I was disappointed
how many limitation it has: no Filtering, no SaveAs,
no most of events and functions, no movingspreading
capabilities for columns of Grid style, etc. If .NET
compatible version of PB have similar limitations, it
won't be that we all are waiting... |
|
| |
Long term utilisation of PowerBuilder
really dependant on roadmap for development, and integration
with .net to allow reuse of components between our .net
applications, plus how long is sybase going to be committed
to supporting conventional client-server development
on powerbuilder? |
|
| |
I just love PB. It's the best language
I've used in all my 30 years of programming. |
|
| |
1)There remains so many bugs in
new release. 2)Intellisense should be there in development
user interface. 3)Powerbuilder should be able to create
.net assembly. 4)Very tight integration with .NET 2.0
is needed. |
|
| |
For PBNI, please add Borlanc C++
builerDelphi interface. |
|
| |
PB has to improve the IDE environment,
especially on the autoscripts, which .NET has offer,
that will further cut down the development time. Datawindow
report painter (design environment) also need to be
improved to suppose guidelines. |
|
| |
Less docbooksguidetutorialhelpexampleconsultant
on PB's 3 tier application development. PB <--> EAServer.
Extreamly less info on PBWF (PowerBuilder Web Framework). |
|
| |
In our country, have problem with
book translate to Indonesian language. So, it is make
we have a problem for new skill for HOW TO with new
PB (for instan ; i donk know develope application wit
PB 6 or more becouse i have no reference to guide me
for it) |
|
| |
PB is best for Client server based
application but not for web based. There are a lot area
where PB can be enhanced specially for web based application.
So try to look from web point of view. Hopefully we
can use PB for web based application development, if
PB can provide us good web based solution. Best of luck.
|
|
| |
Please not too much using resources |
|
| |
Added in example code : - smart-card
- barcode - RFID - RS-232 - UTP etc. |
|
| |
option to formatted report to text
file, to export formatted report to excel and lots of
other queries |
|
| |
option to formatted report to text
file, to export formatted report to excel and lots of
other queries |
|
| |
Marketing of PowerBuilder should
be developed. |
|
| |
I really like working with PB,
but I don't see many companies going for it in present
times. I think Sybase should market PB aggressively
and improve it to bring back the lost glory, once it
had in Client Server applications and also incorporate
the multi tier technologies to make it compete against
other tools like .NET and J2EE |
|
| |
Please promote more of PB. You
should market it well. Ideal target are companies moving
towards .Net. Sell and promote the .Net related features
of PB |
Top |
| |
It is good tool for data centric
application |
|
| |
Great software and improving. We
use it mostly for clientserver applications as it is
most powerful in that segment. Plan to use its web features
in the near future. |
|
| |
PB10 works differently under different
operating systems Example:- disabling fileds, hot keys
doesnt work properly under XP. where as PB9 works fine.
I observe some features which are useful in earlier
versions are not supported by earlier versions, I feel
that should not be the way if I am right. It should
be robust and versatile too. Thank You Best Regards
Gopal |
|
| |
PB was such nice front end GUI
tool for rapid application development, but due to lack
of support and marketting, PB is now almost out of market
or no new prokects are comming in PB, whatever existing
projects are there, even companies are thinking of migration
to some other technology, at least this is the situation
in INDIA. |
|
| |
Market it properly |
|
| |
I have worked on almost all the
version of PB and regard it the most user friendly.
Sybase definately needs to look at enhancing its capabilities
so that it can stand a chance against technologies which
are more suited for WEB development. |
|
| |
THis is the the Best tool I ever
worked on for the database applications |
|
| |
PowerBuilder is still the best
for clientserver and desktop applications and maybe
at par with other tools in Web applications. More POWER
to the PowerBuilder team... |
|
| |
We really hope that Sybase will
make DataWindow available in Java.. Not need to be full
Java, .NET way just nice. Doesnt to be full OOP. if
Sybase not interested, Sybase probably can lets others
developers develop the client's frontend tier . Well,
dont mind if undisclosed licence was used. Thanks |
|
| |
PB itself is not enough to respond
today's requirement anymore, unfortunatelly. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder,good tools |
|
| |
Provide a flexible things to develope
web application instead of complicated. |
|
| |
too late .... |
|
| |
Please bring the Linux version
soon. Otherwise u are dead. |
|
| |
Its a great tool to work in |
|
| |
PowerBuilder has no reliable supportive
sites or agents in our region - Middle East - Jordan.
Alas, it seems that it is not popular in this region.
|
|
| |
The PB patches should pass QA before
sending them to the programmers |
|
| |
Please work on this .NET integration,
in order to prevent many PB developers from switching
to .NET |
|
| |
Any plans to bundle EA Server and
Data Window.net in later versions at about the same
price? |
|
| |
Very stable tool. We could able
to code all our applications and reports with PB. No
drastic change like what happen to VB (to .Net) users. |
Top |
| |
Technically it's a great product
which allows a very speedy delivery. But it's positioned
more as a legacy product in the market, and therefore
sadly less and less new development is done with PB. |
|
| |
i like pb |
|
| |
PB is a great development environment
and Sybase continues to keep improving its feature set.
However, it would be nice to see its share of the market
grow a bit. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder is ok, IDE is too
unstable. Datawindow.NET looks great but doesn't support
browsers other than IE very well. |
|
| |
It would be great if the .NET integration
was delivered earlier than expected. |
|
| |
We migrated to v9 expecting big
things in Web Services and .net integration. PB could
not deal with quite simple Web Services and the .net
integration was a marketing lie (use Web Services!).
That did it for us - we're telling customers to get
off it - no future. |
|
| |
I think that Powerbuilders environment
(ability to handle many objects - regeneration etc)
and difficulty to develop complex code structures (complex
OO code structures) is letting it down in the market
today. Being able to integrate with other languages
such as .NET or Java is great but the complexities of
maintaining code in this situation makes it a difficult
sell. |
|
| |
After 10 years of using PB intensively
I have come across many PB fickle bugs, and some limitations.
PB was previously 'the' software to use, however now
jobs are becoming limited. |
|
| |
Have used PB since version 4 and
absolutely love it. |
|
| |
No support means time to look elsewhere |
|
| |
Powerbuilder releases need to be
more stable when integrated with source control software
and work tracking software like Serena Tracker and Version
Manager. OR A Powerbuilder do not do list" needs to
be released with the software if scenarios are known
to cause PB to become unstable and crash. PB10 seems
to crash several times a day for developers who are
devoting all their time to coding within the IDE throughout
the day and the loss of their work and train of thought
in the last few minutes is frustrating." |
|
| |
We have used PB since 1992 & been
developing Web applications since 1997. The only real
issue we have is in delivering reports via PDF to the
browser. The Ghost method as documented is far too complicated
there should be a native saveaspdf function that doesn't
require additional software and complex code to get
it to work. |
|
| |
light! light! light! |
|
| |
Powerbuilder is excellent, it's
only problem is bad marketing. |
|
| |
Large legacy apps keep us aligned
with PB. Retraining and re-developing are not practical
for us. We hope Sybase keeps supporting and improving
PB with an eye to backwards compatibility. |
Top |
| |
We need more visual improvements
in pb. and supports to the earlier versions like PB.6x |
|
| |
PB has lost so much market with
.net and Java. PB used to have a stronger precense in
the market 4 years ago. Now, we can see that PB is lossing
market gradually. Not sure what Sybase is doing regarding
this. |
|
| |
we recruit VB progemmers and introduce
them to PB. After that, except for financial gains,
these programmers don't want to work with VB. Because,
PB is very simple yet powerful. For Business Informtion
Systems such as Integrated Accounting Packages, ERPs,
Warehouse/ Logistics/ CRM/ HRM & Payroll Systems, and
any other complex software development project, we think
an Object- orientd tool which could be easily learnt,
using the simpler language BASIC, is very important.
PowerBuilder suits us very well. Infact, we a company
which develops both standard products and custom-built
application-software find that along with the PowerDesigner
tools, PB and Sybase ASA gives so much of flexibility
and creative solution development power. Problems we
face are, due to lack of marketing, the market is forgetting
this company (Sybase) and its tools. Its becoming more
and more difficult to convince new customers with these
technologies, because, they look for the technologies
as well. Further, the developer community also should
be trained, may be even free, so that the followers
of these technologies can increse in number. Look at
the folowing the Free Linux is getting. |
|
| |
Dw is its strength. Keep loading
/ enhancing this painter. |
|
| |
Limited PowerBuilder resources
avalliable in the market. |
|
| |
In my openion, only Marketing is
a different between Power Biulder and Microsoft product.
PB is better than Microsoft products, but PB is not
market in Pakistan/ Asia, it makes difference. |
|
| |
PB is a very RAD and helpful tool.
Some internal issues, if removed, will lead it to more
stable tool. There is room for enhancements as far as
scripting is concerned, integration with other tools
and deployment options. |
|
| |
A product which should be ranked
foremost for its simple and easy interface and working
but with tremendous application processing power. Keep
up the good work, people. |
|
| |
It's a rapid development tool but
nt able to collect more manpower on it due to popularity
of .Net Application |
|
| |
PowerBuilder has lost too much
ground to products which are now more widely accepted.
It is now viewed by both us and our clients as a legacy
product which will be phased out as applications require
major enhancements. Very disappointing that Sybase has
facilitated this by a lack of marketing and vision of
the future. |
|
| |
related to DB you are Strongly,graphic
and web should improve |
|
| |
i think pb is best database realated
application development tool better then any microsoft
product in that field. the only thing that lack its
future development is lack of marketing statergy from
sybase . i think if it was microsoft powerbuilder then
it would have been more popular then any other database
realated application development tool. |
|
| |
I wish PB had the OS support(like
VB has windows) then it would have been a more popular
|
|
| |
Need proper notes. For example
to save a blob object we have no proper notes. Support
is important. |
|
| |
GrapHIC sql building should be
improved to allow more compleX sql queries |
|
| |
I love working in powerbuilder
and its scope should be grown furhter. |
Top |
| |
Please improve the debugger! PB
stretches to the newest technologies, but its foundations
are unstable. The debugger is unstable and unexpected.
Debugging a complex application is a real pain in the
***. |
|
| |
powerbuilder 10 application terminates
when ever i close some objects during developemnt. this
was observed in the runtime also. iam not able to find
out the solution instead of opening it again. Please
rectify this problem as early as possible. Please publish
a detailed elobrated migration problems. i migrated
some of the applications for testing purpose and i faced
so many problems which i didnt find in sybase website.
i had to find them out and recitfy them. Thanks and
Regards Veerendra B |
|
| |
The PowerBuilder Concept is Excellent..
But the implementation is not strong enough. When I
say Not strong enough, I mean The Stability of the Debugger,
The looks of the IDE - and above all - It's stability.
Me and my programmers meet fatal errors and exceptions
during design time every day. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder should work on linux
and on 64 bit microprocessors. Also, native database
driver support for SQL Server 10 should be provided
instead of the OLE DB drivers. Powerbuilder is the best
IDE and best tool ever seen by me and the market. |
|
| |
If PB 11 could support DotNet Web
forms development and if it really works(?) that would
put PB back as popular tool for DB app developers. |
|
| |
Solid product. |
|
| |
It will help us if sybase has some
sample programming/Code and Help library. One of some
problem to developed with Power Builder is we find difficult
how to get power builder reference. |
|
| |
You guys are doing a great wrong
to powebuilder developers in my organization. PowerBuilder
is a very good tool, better than java or .NET, or any
other Technology I know, in regards to Rapid Appliacation
Developlment. You keep investing in web support and
in merging with other technologies such as .NET, but
you forget your customer backbone. These do not use
PB for web development or for .Net Integration. We need
a good competition for Java and other technologies,
and not an attidute of if you can't beat them, join
them". I believe in PB, and you already have a better
tool than any ohter available in the global market.
The only thing left to do is to start fighting in the
public opinion arena! I am tired of hearing people saying:
"powerbuilder is dead". I have been developing in PB
for more than 5 years, and I think you should start
promoring this tool on the iouter image level. Java
is much more popular not because it is better, but because
it's people made it famous and a part of the current
fassion. In my humble opinion, you should do the same.
I am not a maketing person, or a business man. However,
I am aware of financial calculations and motives, and
if your actions are motivated by such reasons, I don't
blame you. One must do what needs to be done in order
to survive. Keep doing your best, in hope that PB becomes
the Java of tomorrow and not the Cobol of Yesterday...
Best Regards, Guy." |
|
| |
Powerbuilder is gooooood :p |
|
| |
I have been using PowerBuilder
for more than ten years. Its really a very powerful
tool, especially datawindow object. However the trend
of world make Java become the first choose. And Sybase
also follow the trend and forget the beauty of PB. I
have test PB10.5 B1, in which, there still not much
improvement. |
|
| |
Can not beat this tool for RAD! |
|
| |
The Code Examples" that come with
the PowerBuilder installation is a good tool to learn
PowerBuilder. However, if you would also include a sample
program that reflects an application (such as a school
where you could enroll students in classes, assign grades,
etc...) that would demonstrate how to put all of the
examples to work in a more realistic environment that
it may be a help in persuading developers to use PowerBuilder.
I suggest getting some of your best programmers together
to create a sophisticated sample application that correctly
uses OO methodology, etc.. so that developers new to
PowerBuilder can see the benefits of using PowerBuilder." |
|
| |
in future PB more develope with
.NET and Database make one application, and sure in
future PB more good |
|
| |
i'm using powerbuilder since version
3, it's great product. unfortunatily sybase didn't spend
much time to ehnance the GUI of the product since long
time. of course there was some improvement since version
6.x but the basic pains that developer face still not
solved, some of those pains are: - i'm using version
6.x becuase i found it very diffecult to use and manage
the new docking windows interduced in verion 7 and later.
- the resizing of labels each time we change some of
the properties like font and size is ver annoying. -
the picture resising on picture button and picture control
also very annoing. |
Top |
| |
Powerbuilder has to improve the
windows graphical objects and menu |
|
| |
Powerbuilder is easy to lern and
is for DB Applications the best tool, but powerbuilder
hasn't same features that PB Coder need. Some Features:
Callbacks (without terrible PBNI), WindowsForms, full
.NET support. The Fixes-List shoudt be better, because
we find bugs in a Runtime and a Runtime later the bug
is corrected and it isnt documentated. |
|
| |
sybase taking too long to catch
up. other technologies are stable and available now,
10.5 may introduce new gui enhancements but we are converting
to e.g. .net because we can benefit now. we will phase
out pb over the next year. |
|
| |
1. EAServer pricing is geared to
large corporations. It cannot be cost justified even
for small organisation of 5 users after taking into
consideration the development/migration costs. 2. There
is no other way to PB Web development except through
EAServer. 3. MS Is killing PB as far as Web development
with Visual Studio. Why not open provide the means of
native PB (not DW.NET) access to the Web? |
|
| |
Sybase should improve its marketting
efforts for Powerbuilder.It an excellent GUI. |
|
| |
Wonderful but no marketting |
|
| |
good |
|
| |
powerbuilder works great for what
it does, but whenever I want to do something special,
I have to jump through all sorts of hoops. If COM/.NET
integration were better, then doing the more difficult
/ powerful stuff would be a lot easier. Its very hard
to integrate non-pb components |
|
| |
1) Sybase should market and enhance
this great tool like Microsoft does its products. 2)
Sybase! Please implement Windows Graphical Objects improvements"
as soon as possible both in datawindow and window contols
so we can compete with others." |
|
| |
COULD YOU PROVE TO ME THAT POWERBUILDER
IS THE POWERFUL TOOLS FOR DEVELOPMENT...? |
|
| |
it's sad to say so many company
not use powerbuilder anymore. sybase should enhance
object structure like menu, windows, etc |
|
| |
Sybase should pay more attention
to Indian Subcontiaent. Powerbuilder is Very Good,Developer-friendly
& attractive, Only Sybase should give more efforts like
Training-Institute,Seminar etc. and soon Powerbuilder
will reach the top of the world. |
|
| |
The OleDB driver for MS-SQL has
to many bugs. Therefore I can not upgrade to a newer
powerbuilder version (I am still using PB6.5). Datawindow
graphs on several pages is an importent improvement
I am waiting for. The windows version has not been developed
much the last years! |
|
| |
go into promoting PB in the education
sector to create a pool of talents. |
|
| |
I worked on Visual Basic and Power
Builder as front end development tools where PB is 10
times powerful than VB. I request only for good marketing
and introduction to developers about new features of
PB new versions as well as step towards no need to migrate
the PB application to Web based application rather PB
should support well as we based tool. Thank You |
Top |
| |
Personally I'd like to see: New
OO features, such as Interfaces, inner / local classes.
More use of exceptions for error handling. Nicer GUI
fetures (rollover web style buttons) |
|
| |
The PB need be more fast in check
SQL statement in PBScript. The object graphic" is ungly
and with low resources and low possibilities of customization |
|
| |
Sybase is killing PowerBuilder
itself. It's a great delopment tool but with investment
could be better. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder are the best language
with I work, unhappyly this software no more used. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder use to be the best
development tool, in my opinion, but it has been stuck
in time, so we have started to develop in .Net and now
it´s difficult to go back to PB. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder é a linguagem de programação
que melhor otimiza a construção e a manutenção de sistemas
em uma grande empresa. |
|
| |
1. Please listen to the Independent
Sybase User Group a lot more. 2. Please beef up PB marketing
strategy. 3. Penetrate the school market agressively.
4. Lower the cost. 5. Don't let PB die of natural death |
|
| |
My #1 gripe is the how difficult
it is to find information about PB. |
|
| |
1. Is a Good tool for developed
database aplication 2. Easy for maintenance 3. But not
Easy For Design a beautiful Interface Thnk |
|
| |
We are using Macromedia Flex for
our web front end and EA Server for our middle tier
to develop new web applications. The combination works
very well. No HTML to deal with, no .NET or Java to
deal with. Just PB code and actionscript. Both are great
languages. I wish Sybase would partner with Macromedia
to push this new architecture. It sure beats the complexity
of AJAX and nothing comes close to the end user experience. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder is a very fine product
that is well capable of developing any sort of application.
This is the product that I enjoyed most in my development
career. Presently I am developing Database Driven Application
in DotNet but I still find it very far from near to
Powerbuilder style of development as long as Database
Driven Application Development is concerned. In my opinion
what Powerbuilder Company requires more is Marketing
People than any further Technological Development. The
marketing People who can sell the product aggresively
carving out strategies for pricing, advertisement and
other such things. |
|
| |
I feel Sybase is not marketing
this product or infact any of its products effectively. |
|
| |
EJB client functionality should
be improved a) to support newer jdk versions b) to fix
the bugs in the current implementation c) to support
newer ejb specification. |
|
| |
I ahve problem in migratin from
PB 6.5 to Pb 10. i am unable to receive return values
from stored procedure in pb10. Please help |
|
| |
I have been using PB for the last
10 years. It is great. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder is great application
development tools. |
|
| |
I have been a PowerBuilder consultant
for the last 8 years. I love PowerBuilder. But it's
losing market because of .Net technologies and lack
of marketing from Sybase. |
Top |
| |
Very good product, but poor materials(books)not
available in the market. |
|
| |
Looking forward to more improvements
to Datawindow.NET and tighter integration with .NET
framework. Maybe even include as part of Visual Studio
.NET 2006 suite?. |
|
| |
I am a keen fans of PB from PB4
to PB10. Good luck to PB and wish it has a more bright
future! |
|
| |
We need to have Dynamic Variable
name declaration. We must have J2EE auto building for
PowerBuilder Applications, so that we can PowerBuilder
Appliations anywhere. We need to make to support Script
Files inside the applications. so that we can make ERP
programs with Powerbuilde. ie. if a customer need to
add a functionality, we need to give provision for him
to make it over the application. And that script should
be a special sort of Script which can be attached with
the application and its language shuld be little business
man's language. Guess you got what exactly i meant.
thanks |
|
| |
Getting harder and harder to find
talented Powerbuilder developers.. Considering moving
to .Net.. The .Net datawindow is a huge interest. When
is version 2.0 due? |
|
| |
There are problems with refreshment
of the screen in applications developed in Powerbuilder.There
is no solution provider for this. Powersoft would say
it is the o/s and o/s would say it is related to Powerbuilder. |
|
| |
Need better integration with .NET
support for web services specially .NET ENUM (enumurated
data type support in PB 10.5) and more detailed help
on the use of .NET web services |
|
| |
Great PB...! |
|
| |
Software needs to be updated. Starting
to show it's age. Still quirky at times. Great tool,
but it could be made better! Easy web integration. |
|
| |
i need powerbuilder in linux |
|
| |
1.To make difference from .NET
and try not rely on .NET 2 T continue support XCOPY
features for easy deployment, 3.For database connectivities
if can provide standmoudle for XML connectivities will
be useful for system development used in internet and
rich GUI features |
|
| |
have a nice future! |
|
| |
good |
|
| |
Is is easy to learn and use PowerBuilder
because the GUI & script are user friendly. |
|
| |
Microsoft .NET and Java polarized
computers applications' industry. Sybase took a long
time to Web enable PB and after that to make a .NET
enabled development environment. Well, I think Sybase
has the same syndrome as Borland: to decide toward Java
or Microsoft. It stayed in the middle going nowhere. |
|
| |
Need an improvisation towards the
marketing process for an effective market penetration. |
|
| |
I'm a big fan and a long time pb
developer (1997). Keep up the good work! Unfortunately
I think we are switching to MS .NET within the year... |
|
| |
hope power builder will lead the
market in coming future |
Top |
| |
We have much work to do on limited
budgets. |
|
| |
Great product and keep improving
|
|
| |
Being able to develop solutions
for LAMP is becoming more important. Any chance PowrBuilder
could support that platform. |
|
| |
Marketing Marketing Marketing |
|
| |
Need more integration platform
for web based applications, mainly professional level. |
|
| |
Please continue to improve PB.
Easy deployment to web will surely make PB a very verastile
and indispensable RAD tool. |
|
| |
code once, deploy to any platform |
|
| |
With so many Java projects either
costing 3 times as much as 4GL development & many failed
projects NOW is the time for PB to step into the lime
light again! Marketing is key or many java projects
will simply go to .NET because PB isn't in vogue any
more. |
|
| |
Sybase does not push PB hard enough
and their martketing and developer support is poor compared
to MS. |
|
| |
En Latinoamerica deberia existir
una mayor fuerza de ventas para proponer a las empresas
cambiarse a Powerbuilder. |
|
| |
I have used PowerBuilder from 1998
to 2001. PowerBuilder is a great tool for developing
Client-Server app. But it failed in the web-based development
era. My suggestion is to develop some integrated tools
to develop web base application. |
|
| |
Sybase should go for proper marketing
for PB, as PB is far far better than any other MS front
end tool. |
|
| |
It's dead. |
|
| |
There needs to be web services
and XML capabilities in Desktop PowerBuilder or a Developers'
version of PowerBuilder Enterprise. I cannot afford
the investment now in Enterprise and I need to develop
web services. I want to leverage my investement in PowerBuilder.
PowerBuilder needs better marketing. It is a great product.
Maybe they could have a joint venture with the Stylist
Studio product. |
|
| |
pb is very good platform |
|
| |
Good tool. Need to include a lot
of controls like activex natively. Must support Rich
text printing as normal datawindow column. |
|
| |
We can not received any suggestions
about new technoligies such as xml or web services etc.,
and when we've problems about EAServer we does not received
good answer or good support from expert team in thailand.
(We use PowerBuilder V6 (Old Application)and V9, Sybase
12.5, EAServer 5.2.0) |
|
| |
Rapid Development! |
Top |
| |
i likk pb, but i'm worried i will
be stuck with a dead technology |
|
| |
Power Builder Resource very difficult
findout. I'm worry about the future of Power Builder.
But it never dead. Regards, john |
|
| |
for future we need to develop more
applications and web applications with great 4gl environment
of powerbuilder as it is no more less than other interested
technologies like .net etc. |
|
| |
I am working on pb for the last
2 years and in this timeperiod i have seen that pb is
a very good rapid application development tool,basically
it helps us to develop the desktop alpplications very
fastly but where it lacks is the ablility to create
n - tier applications. Because in today's scenario its
very important that you should be able to fetch the
accurate data from anywhere, anytime and its retreival
time should also be very less i.e very less time complexity.
and this is possible in web applction development only. |
|
| |
No Comments |
|
| |
Don't die with JAVA |
|
| |
non |
|
| |
very useful improvements with pb
10.5 in visual appearance, well done! good: support
other application servers like jboss, geronimo on july
2006 very good: pocketbuilder!!! important to improve:
use rtf-report as nested report in composite datawindows
in general: be quicker in integration of new technologys,
we are always 2 - 4 later as .NET or JAVA-developers,
why?! wishes: gantt - control like varchart gantt of
nettronic |
|
| |
Possible to lower the price hence
attract more people to join powerbuilder ? powerbuilder
has a very good datawindow, but most programmers use
microsoft products, not just because of the features,
but also the price. |
|
| |
Marketing is TOO weak for powerbuilder!
I haven't seen any advertising, promotion, introduction,
seminars, etc. for powerbuilder this year... yes, there
was one, the email from sybase about the launch of PB
10.0, that is! no more! Please, do more marketing on
powerbuilder & improve the image! |
|
| |
Go Ahead ... |
|
| |
We use Powerbuilder for small to
medium-sized client-server apps with any of several
DBMS back-ends. I like its scripting capacities and
full set of features. I have been able to make it do
many interesting things. It can be glitchy, however,
and sometimes its behavior is different when deployed
than it is on the developer desktop, which can be very
annoying. |
|
| |
Very happy with PB and using since
1996 |
|
| |
if datawindow painter has many
objects, it does not performs as expected & gives page
fault in pbudo9.dll.... |
|
| |
Give the .Net and Linux version
of PB soon. If not we have to move towards other tools
and once moved (by investing on new tools and trainings)
we will not be able to come back to PowerBuilder. Both
these trends must be addressed fast as well as advertisements
in both techno and consumer magazines (like what Microsoft
does) should take place. |
Top |
| |
Its very nice to work with powerbuilder.Easy
and programmer friendly software. |
|
| |
should have more presence and a
will to market against a less featureless but a powerfull
marketing similar product |
|
| |
J2EE without EA Server would be
nice, as would a no runtime" executable and some access
to bitwise operations." |
|
| |
I have been a PB developer since
version 3.0a. I think this tool is fantastic. Some companies
are changing because they feel experienced IT people
will not be around to maintain. I think the learning
curve is minimal, also client server had a bad rap for
being a fat client back when client machines were not
like desktops today, and with the increase of bandwidth
you do not see the refresh issues of the past. I think
security is better and developement is must faster. |
|
| |
I hope more support will get for
powerbuilder from powersoft and powerbuilder should
be the best frienldy languagae for programmer and as
well as the user. |
|
| |
Actually the powerbuilder as a
Client / Server tool is good. No tool can beat the powerbuilder.
But at the web application level, in the software many
improvements needs to be done for the current and future
needs. |
|
| |
1) It's transacT sql, not transac
! 2) In the future answers" should have "I don't know
alternatives) " |
|
| |
I have Q: why some time the PB
is Exit by it self .for ex, if you want to save your
work some go down the PB . Pls check this error Thank
U I want some website name for help us in the PB Pls
help us. |
|
| |
Improve the form gui develop,provide
more feathure in gui design. |
|
| |
I have been using PowerBuilder
since 1997. I have developed applications using several
other platforms as well including VB, Java, Developers
9i, .NET (C#) but I am still to come up against a platform,
language or development environment that provides that
much control and power that PowerBuilder does. I just
hope the guys at Sybase market this tool more efficiently
so the people in the software development business that
are not using PowerBuilder could see what we have seen. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder should improve their
objects such as in Visual Basic, customizable bevel
width/height for each control. More powertips on objects.
More properties on picture button, improvement on flat
button plus other object should be flat enabled also.
Thanx |
|
| |
PB is better than the best in client/server.
It needs to catch up with others in Web development.
There is need to grow awarness within corporate world
about sybase and Powerbuilder. Advertise more! |
|
| |
Marketing of PowerBuilder is not
good. No product can survive without good marketing.
Hope you will improve the marketing, or else sell it
to Microsoft who can do good marketing |
|
| |
Great product. Totally underated.
Gives us a real advantage. |
|
| |
Please make sure that user can
work only with keyboard in PowerBuilder IDE . Actually
this is very important aspect of IDE and i think this
is lacking in PowerBuilder as we have to use mouse very
frequently and sometimes its mendatory to use mouse.
please try to improve this |
|
| |
The company made a decision several
years ago to stop using PowerBuilder for new development.
The question we are facing now is how long will it be
viable to maintain our existing PB applications. |
Top |
| |
I would like to have the hability
to create WEB applications using power builder full
features, like command buttons, ddlb, dddw, dw, tree
views, etc... Coding this kind of objects requires a
lot of work to be on WEB applications. What the common
sense about PB is in the industry is that it will disappear.
Basically driven out by cheaper products like Microsoft's.
What the management do not see is the capability of
creating applications in shorter time using Power Builder.
Also Sybase lacks of free seminars, and a better documentations
on how to build WEB applications using PowerBuilder.
If at least one person in Sybase could come and do a
demostration on what it takes to make WEB applications
using Power Builder, the future would be better... |
|
| |
I like this Client Server tool
very much. I feel and wish that it should get more market
share. Sybase should market it on more vast canvas.
Microsoft continue its market publicity at every level
especially in Asia (Pakistan) but I did not observe
such marketing of Sybase. Personally I did not know
SYBASE as per Power Builder tool But i know micorosoft
as per .Net, So I feel that SYBASE should market its
product on long horizons. If everyone knows it, most
of them try to use it. |
|
| |
It is definitely the best C/S application
development tool. |
|
| |
Hope PowerBuilder to update with
new controls, presentations which will attract more
people. |
|
| |
when will the next version be released? |
|
| |
We are trying to learn more about
PowerBuilder. |
|
| |
Too little too late from Sybase!
Moving all new development to C# then will port legacy
apps to C#. |
|
| |
Please call me @404 562 8022. |
|
| |
Everything is ok. But marketing
is very poor. product support also very poor in india.
Kind improve. |
|
| |
I like powerbuilder. The IDE is
buggy, always has. I'd prefer dropping PBLs and just
use the *.sr* files; more like other main stream products.
Callbacks from DLLs would be nice. |
|
| |
Looking forward to more detailed
Rich Text capabilities in datawindow objects. Controlling
the fonts of words and columns within a computed column.
Advancement of the Format property will allow a wider
use of merge documents and html exporting in template
format. Actually this was one fo the only stops. HTML
export from Sybase direct would be nice but that's another
animal altogether. |
|
| |
want to know it is better to be
using Power Builder or not? |
|
| |
Menu in powerbuilder is seems to
be weak. Inorder to achive MDI feature i have to inherit
window menu from frame menu. I feel powerbuilder just
replaces menu. i don't think it is nice idea.. Other
tools(eg. .net) handles menu in nice way |
|
| French |
|
|
| |
Dommage qu'on n'entende pas assez
parler de powerbuilder. Il serait peut être intéressant
de développer un partenariat avec de grandes SSII car
en tant que développeur, on a tendance à plus entendre
parler d'offres DOTNET que de PB. On a le sentiment
que PB et ses avantages en tant que langage de développement
(je pense notamment aux PFC) n'est pas suffisament connu
des décideurs. Quel dommage! |
Top |
| |
powerbuilder est en regression
et est en train de mourir a petit feu... |
|
| |
En espérant que l'intégration à
.NET ne conduise pas à la fin de PowerBuilder ! |
|
| |
Avoir plus de suivi sur les furures
versions |
|
| |
Le PowerBuilder reste l'outil de
developpement le plus puissant que j'ai rencontré dans
mes développement. Mais ous avons des problème de migration
vers une version supériere, si vous pouvez nous aider
à imigrer vers la version 10. nous sommes sur windows
serveur 2003. |
|
| |
A regret la décision a été prise
par la direction d'abandonner PB pour Java |
|
| |
Il faudrait développer plus rapidement
les aspects mobilité en tirant profit des DW qui sont
vraiment un outil très efficace. La communication autout
des developpements via PB pour des applications nomades
devrait être renforcée. |
|
| |
Toujours des problèmes sur la gestion
native en source contrôle. L'aide syntaxique au développment
est toujours à améliorer, sans compter l'inexistance
du refactoring. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder nous donne entièrement
satisfaction avec une productivité maximum. |
|
| |
environnement beaucoup trop buggé
et pénible à utiliser (surtout avec SourceSafe) grosses
applications trop lentes composants avec comportement
non standard |
|
| |
Je n'ai pas répondu à la question
12, car nous n'attendons rien de PB : nous utilisons
la version 6.5, qui satisfait nos besoins. Des petites
applis avec peu d'utilisateurs, et qui doivent arriver
rapidement sont encore développées en PB, sinon, nous
utilisons Java. |
|
| |
L'intégration avec les composants
.net est devenue stratégique pour notre entreprise.
Si elle ne s'améliore pas nous devrons changer de produit
! Ce que nous ne souhaitons pas, car nous sommes actuellement
très satisfait de PB. |
|
| |
Nous utilisons actuellement PB8
(avec librairie utilisateur reposant sur les PFC) pour
une application et PB10 pour une autre. Le portage de
l'application PB8 vers PB10 a posé problème lors de
la compilation et il semble que cela soit très dur de
le faire (de nombreuses erreurs et warnings surviennent).
Nous espèrons avoir une solution simple à mettre en
oeuvre pour le réaliser afin de n'avoir plus qu'un environnement. |
|
| |
J'ai tout de même l'impression
que Power builder est en phase de devenir un dinosaure
de l'informatique un peu comme COBOL à son époque. |
|
| |
Nous utilisons PB avec les PFC
qui offre des composants graphiques basés" relativement
interressants. Toutefois cette panoplie d'objets devraient
être développée davantage, optimisée et pourquoi etre
proposée de base dans PB, sans forcement inclure les
PFC. Souvent nous devons faire appel à des fonctions
externes, notamment l'API WIN32, pour obtenir certaines
fonctionnalités manquantes. Un point noir important
pour nous est la gestion des sources sur de gros projets
avec plusieurs développeurs, il faut etre tres vigilant!
cordialement, stéphane. " |
|
| |
La version 10 semble moins robuste
que les précédentes, nous avons beaucoup de mal à trouver
un build qui ne fasse pas régression par rapport à notre
version 8. Mais néanmoins vos équipes supprt font un
excellent boulot pour nous trouvez une solution. |
|
| |
Realease de la version 10 désastreuses |
|
| |
Le choix de powerbuilder n'a pas
été retenu pour les developpement N-Tiers. (JAVA, J2EE,
JBOSS). Nous maintenons notre parc applicatif en PB8.
Et réalisons des adaptations mineures des applications.
Nous prevoyons la migration vers PB10 et Oracle 9. |
Top |
| German |
|
|
| |
Powerbuilder zerstört
unseren Lebenswillen. |
|
| |
vor allem offizielle unterstützung
für WINE (Linux) wie bei den anderen (GUPTA etc..) |
|
| |
- completly instable IDE (crashes
at lightspeed) - ancient language (no interfaces, no
constructors, etc) - incomplety XP-integration - not
able to build an Exe" at first time (always has to rebuild
some libraries) - no support for refactorings like M |
|
| |
PowerBuild should become more stable,
thats the most important point for large projects |
|
| |
Es sollten durchgängig mehr Windows-Standards
benutzt werden, wie z. B. die Standard-Windows-Statusleiste,
welche mehrere Abschnitte und Icons erlaubt. |
|
| |
Die Arbeit mit grafischen DWs bedarf
unbedingt einer Verbesserung! |
|
| |
Gibt ein paar Probleme vor allem
beim Print, aber im großen und ganzen zufrieden damit.
Hat leider nicht den Stellenwert in der Welt den es
haben sollte |
|
| |
LINUX!!! |
|
| |
Man sollte doch schneller neue
features bzw. bugfixes auf Markt bringen! |
|
| |
Sybase versteht absolut nichts
von Marketing. PB gibt es meiner meinung nach noch 8
Jahre. |
|
| |
In PB10 sind immer noch sehr viele
Fehler enthalten. Abstürze treten jede halbe Stunde
auf. |
|
| |
Es fehlen selbst in Powerbuilder
10 windows common controls, die in Windows Standard
sind. Die COM-Integration, d.h. der Aufruf von fremden
COM-Servern ist mangelhaft. Die Stabilität des Programms
ist verbesserungswürdig |
Top |
| |
PowerBuilder ist ausgezeichnet,
die TCPIP-Funktionalität ist jedoch nicht professionell |
|
| |
PowerBuilder ist noch sehr gut,
kann aber mit anderen Technologien am Markt nicht mehr
mithalten. |
|
| |
Für Datenbank (ClientServer optimal |
|
| |
EA-Server is too expensive, so
we have to migrate to microsoft products. Also .Net
is very easy instead of EA-Server.... Greetings from
BlackForest |
|
| |
Sybase ist ein Nischenanbieter
und betreibt kein Marketing für PB. |
|
| |
Wir haben Interessenten - auch
bestehende Kunden - die unsere PowerBuilder-Applikation
(DokumentenarchivierungGeschäftsprozesse) unter Linux
einsetzen möchten. Leider ist es bis jetzt nicht möglich
ohne Emulation (VMWare) eine PB-Applikation unter Linux
zum Laufen zu bringen. Eine PowerBuilder-Version für
Linux wäre sehr willkommen und würde einen riesigen
Markt öffnen. mit freundlichen Grüssen CM Informatik
AG, Fredy Marugg |
|
| |
Das PB-Konzept ist gut. Die Entwicklungsumgebung
könnte mit Features aus Eclipse verbessert werden (Syntaxergänzung,
Editierfenster großklein durch Doppelklick, Code Refactoring,
..). Die Stabilität von PB 8, 9 ist schlecht. Das Programm
stürtzt mehrmals am Tag ab. |
|
| |
1.Es wäre sinnvoll, wenn die nächste
Powerbuilder-Version weniger neue Features, dafür aber
auch weniger Bugs hätte. Das Setzen und Löschen von
Breakpoints funktioniert eher zufällig - darauf ist
leider kein Verlass. 2.Was auch eim Makel ist, ist dass
man Objekte, in denen ein Fehler ist nur noch mit Edit-Source
öffnen kann um den Fehler zu bereinigen. 3.Wünschenswert
wäre auch, dass man bei im Editor geöffneten Objekten
auch die Vaterklasse öffnen kann, um in deren Funktionen
etwas nachzusehen - momentan muss man dazu immer eine
zweite Powerbuilder-Instanz öffnen, das nervt bei PowerBuilder
schon immer. |
|
| |
Bevor irgendwelche Neuerungen eingebaut
werden, sollte Sybase erst dafür sorgen, daß die bestehende
Umgebung wesentlich stabiler läuft. Würde man sämtliche
Abstürze in der Entwicklungsumgebung tatsächlich dem
sybase support engineer" melden, müßte Sybase hunderte
von Leuten einstellen und ausbilden, nur um die Support-Anfragen
zu beantworten." |
|
| |
- leider hat PB nach wie vor eine
sehr instabile Programmierumgebung - da die Anwendungen
immer komplexer werden, halte ich eine Weiterentwicklung
des Debuggers für sinnvoll |
|
| |
Leider habe ich nur die 6er Version
und scheue die Investition für eine aktuelle Version.
Daher mache ich die Dinge die bis 2003 in PB entwickelt
wurden jetzt in VB oderund VC. Kunden, die den Quellcode
bekommen, wollen üblicherweise auf Microsoft entwickelt
haben. |
|
| |
Die Entwicklungsumgebung für PowerBuilder
ist die schlechtest, die ich kenne und ich kenne mehr
als eine Allgemein mach PB einen sehr verstaubten Eindruck
(ich habe 4 Jahre Vollzeit-PB-Erfahrung) |
Top |
| Spanish |
|
|
| |
Saludos, programamos poco con Power
ya que a veces no podemos trabajar con el evento que
permite capturar la tecla deseads ENTER", en la version
6 y 7 son un desastre estamos incursionando en la version
9.0 haber como es, pero los cambios son abismales, si
publicarian algunos ejemplos seria bueno, SALUDOS A
TODOS" |
|
| |
Saludos, programamos poco con Power
ya que a veces no podemos trabajar con el evento que
permite capturar la tecla deseads ENTER", en la version
6 y 7 son un desastre estamos incursionando en la version
9.0 haber como es, pero los cambios son abismales, si
publicarian algunos ejemplos seria bueno, SALUDOS A
TODOS" |
|
| |
es una herramienta flexible. |
|
| |
Pb para Linux ya!!! |
|
| |
definitivamente powerbuilder es
una herramienta muy completa , el gran problema de mas
de un analista es que conoce solo una parte de las opciones
, deberia haber un manual o un libro en donde explique
paso a paso cada uno de las maravillosas opciones que
tiene esta potente herramienta. |
|
| |
Motivado al Decreto precidencial
se obliga a migrar a estardares abierto por ende la
utilización del Power Builder sera minima este año y
en el venidero |
|
| |
Incluir opcion de Driver Nativo
para SQLSERVER(microsoft) en PB10 Y PB10.5 |
|
| |
Llevo trabajando con PB desde la
version 4 y la verdad me parece una herramienta muy
potente para el desarrollo de aplicaciones. |
|
| |
Herramientas de conversion de datos
desde los DW a datos planos (txt) que contenga solo
la informacion necesario y el formarto deseado |
|
| |
PowerBuilder es una herramienta
grandiosa en lo que a manejo de datos y productividad
en desarroollo, pero, en lo que respecta a interfaz
no te deja muchas alternativas. |
|
| |
COMO HERRAMIENTA STAND ALONE es
muy buena, PERO TENEMOS QUE MIGRAR A TECNOLOGIAS WEB...
y powerbuilder en este sentido no brinda muchos beneficios,
lo mismo con sistemas operativos linux. ES LO QUE ESTAMOS
ESpanishERANDO... POWERBUILDER para linux y POWERBUILDER
para desarrollos web |
|
| |
Es un gran prodcuto pero aun le
falta que la parte de web gràfica (JSpanish) tenga un
interface mucho mas àgil i fàcil. Que ha sido siempre
su gran punto fuerte. Es decir hace falta un RAD" para
la parte gràfica Web." |
|
| |
Ojalá se pudiera mejorar en documentación
en línea y soporte al usuario. El éxito para nuestro
trabajo seria el que se incluya georeferenciación desde
PowerBuilder con datawindows que produzcan mapas. Necesitamos
más soporte en Power Builder como herramienta de desarrolloa
para la Web, y nos cuesta trabajo hacerlo con otras
herramientas (PHP, ASP, JAVA) |
|
| |
Existe poco documentación y manuales
en español que permitan sacarle provecho a las herramientas
web que proporciona PB. |
|
| |
Mas difusión y soporte en América
Latina, sobre todo a nivel educativo para que las universidades
preparen a los estudiantes en estas herramientas. Oracle
y Microsoft tienen mucho terreno ganado en este sentido. |
|
| |
Lamentablemente tengo aplicaciones
desde la versión 4, 6.5 y 7 y me gustaría standarizar
el problema es que no tengo una herramiente que me permita
migrar de la version 4 a las 7, si existe alguna alternativa
me gustaría saberlo. |
Top |
| |
Especialmente falta mejoras en
la presentacion visual. |
|
| |
Sería bueno que envíen mensualmente
las nuevas características de cada release que saca
PowerBuilder y algunos tips para el desarrollo con PowerBuilder |
|
| |
Aun presenta problemas al manejar
grandes cantidades de datos en memoria, degenerando
la interfaz gráfica. |
|
| |
Dado que deseamos conocer mas las
herramientas de PB10 ó PB10.5, podrian darnos algun
link donde podamos descargar una version de prueba de
estos productos? En si PB me impacto desde que logre
realizar mi primera aplicacion, sus herramientas son
muy completas, pero debe integrarse a lo que hoy en
dia esta abarcando al desarrollo, aplicacions orientadas
a la web. |
|
| |
PB es una buena herramienta, para
desarrollo, pero tenemos pocos cursos de certificación
en el Marcado. |
|
| |
En líneas generales PowerBuilder
es un gran IDE (tanto el lenguaje como su entorno de
desarrollo). Nos preocupa la baja introducción de este
lenguaje en la comunidad de desarrolladores que puede
hacerlo desaparecer en favor de los 2 grandes competidores:
J2EE y .NET. Hay grandes esfuerzos por parte de los
líderes (Sun y Microsoft) para fidelizar a los desarrolladores
sobre sus plataformas. Creo, en lo personal, que Sybase
debería plantear una estrategia similar para no perder
tanto capital humano y seguir proyectando a PowerBuilder
como un lenguaje de última generación y como una herramienta
RAD (Rapid Application Development). Exitos. Damián
Ríos |
|
| |
que siga desarrollando y si hubieran
cursos para capacitacion a precios accesibles |
|
| |
PowerBuilder es una de las herramientas
de programación mas completas que he tenido el gusto
de utilizar, realmente es muy bueno, aunque espero que
cambie mucho mas y salga pronto una versión para Linux |
|
| |
La herramienta es muy robusta,
pero nos gustaria que tuviera opciones para poder migrar
aplicaciones a WEB mas precisas |
|
| |
felicitaciones por realizar estas
encuentas y unir a los desarrolladores de power builder |
|
| |
A PowerBuilder SOLO le falta mejorar
un poco el powerScript pero desarrollar mucho su desarollo
orientado a Web. Si pudieran desarrollar algo similar
al entorno de Visual Studio seria sensacional |
|
| |
Buenos dias, soy Ing. de sistemas
y muy autodidacta, me gustaria algunos manuales sobre
las nuevas caracteristicas de PB10 y la integracion
con el framework, q versiones soporta, etc. Muchas gracias |
|
| |
Es una excelente herramienta de
desarrollo y además me gusta porque es amigable y fácilmente
diseña y crea nuavas aplicaciones, en lo personal yo
imparte clases de PB en la Universidad Evangélica desde
hace 4 ciclos y me encanta este programa. |
Top |
| |
Herramienta Interesante, pero que
muchos personas que toman decisiones no lo ven asi (ya
que para ellos todo es JAVA). Seria bueno que se brinden
licencias para pruebas y estudios y asi poder desarrollar
pilotos y vender facilidad y capacidad de la herramienta.
|
|
| |
ME AGRADA PERO SE DEBE IMPLEMENTAR
EL SOPORTE PARA LINUX, PARA UN FUTURO PROXIMO |
|
| |
Seguir expandiendo la difusion
(Manuales, Foros, etc) de esta herramienta en español. |
|
| |
Powerbuilder me ha demostrado (en
los 7 años que llevo programando en el mismo) ser una
de las mejores alternativas para el desarrollo de aplicaciones
cliente-servidor con acceso a bases de datos relacionales.
Sin embargo, aún es muy flojo en cuanto a desarrollo
Web, su integración con Java y .NET no me redunda en
ningún beneficio, puesto que también desarrollo en esas
herramientas, y para colmo de males su posibilidad de
correr exclusivamente en un servidor como el EAServer
lo hace muy poco atractivo para Web Development. Otra
cosa preocupante a mi parecer es que el Powerbuilder
10 (que es la herramienta que adquirí recientemente)
es muy inestable, no ha mejorado los objetos que ya
tienen problemas en anteriores versiones (ejemplo el
objeto menu), aplicaciones funcionando en versión 9
han sido migradas al 10 y los resultados fueron un poco
menos que catastróficos, por lo que ahora seguimos desarrollando
en el 9. No hay ninguna mejora interesante, dos nuevos
controles (esperaba más), pocas mejoras al powerscript,
la introducción de soporte unicode fué fatal (lectura
y escritura de archivos tiene problemas). En fin; podría
seguir largamente. |
|
| |
Realmente Power Builder me parece
una excelente herramienta, no pienso cambiarla por otra,
si me gustaría tener mas información o manuales acerca
de como hacer proyectos web con PowerBuilder. |
|
| |
Para nuestro caso, PB se está orientando
mucho a .NET y la tecnología a la que nuestra empresa
se proyecta es J2EE. |
|
| |
Muy tarde fue el intento de power
para el desarrollo WEB |
|
| |
Me gustaría saber mas acerca de
powerbuilder con aplicaciones intranet e internet...Y
que el costo de las herramientas para desarrollar en
internet sean menos costosas para poder adquirirlos. |
|
| |
Faltan foros o documentacion en
español de ejemplos o para consultas |
|
| |
es optimo para aplicaciones medianas. |
|
| |
Power builder es un excelente lenguaje
de programación, pero me gustaria tener mas información
de las nuevas herramientas para poder tener la forma
de graficar en forma dinamica con un poco mas de herramientas
para poder ofrecer un poco mas de calidad en estas a
los usuarios finales.. |
|
| |
Hace falta la posibilidad de desarrollar
aplicaciones WEB que funcionen en entornos Libre (Apache,
etc.) |
|
| |
los problemas que he encontrado
al utilizar dll hechos en c# algunos no se dejan incorporar
a powerbuilder por el manejo de punteron que se hace
en c# |
|
| |
No existen muchos libros de PowerBuilder
actualmente en el mercado, sería conveniente generar
más literatura al respecto. |
|
| |
1) Me gustaría saber si estas encuestas
están siendo reportadas a Sybase y cual es su opinion
al respecto, es decir, cuales son sus planes a futuro
sobre PB. 2) Deberían separar PB del desarrollo Web
y hacer una nueva herramienta (PowerWeb?) Así el equipo
de desarrollo de PB no se distraería y podría mejorar
el GUI que tanto falta le hace; hay muchas mejoras que
se pueden hacer. Yo tengo una lista de mejoras para
PowerBuilder que con gusto se las hago llegar si es
su deseo. 3) Están cayendo en el síndrome de la versión
10 en la que el producto se vuelve tan complejo que
se hace inestable. Tengan cuidado. 4) PowerBuilder es
como el Latín; todo mundo sabe que existió pero nadie,
en la práctia, lo usa actualmente. En las encuestas
cuando preguntan qué herramientas se están utilizando
no se menciona PowerBuilder. Cuando voy con un cliente
y le digo utilizo PowerBuilder me mira con recelo y
se cuestiona si será conveniente desarrollar su aplicacion
en una herramienta que pocos programadores saben usar.
En resumen Sybase necesita promover más PowerBuilder.
Les hago una pregunta muy sencilla, si Sybase quisiera
vender la división de PowerBuilder, ¿habría alguien
que se lo compraría? 5) Porque no cambian su numeración
y sacan PowerBuilder 2006? Por lo menos aprendan algo
de mercadotecnia de Microsoft. 6) Esta encuesta no está
bien diseñada. Por ejemplo, no utilizo PocketBuilder
para desarrollar aplicaciones móviles porque simple
y sencillamente no desarrollo aplicaciones móviles,
y no porque utilice otra herramienta que no sea PocketBuilder.
|
|
| |
In each new versionpatch allways
IDE is very inestable. |
|
| |
Mejorar la exportación a documentos
como Excel, es decir que lod DW se puedan migrar a excel
tal y como estan diseñados o como se muestran en ejecución |
Top |
| |
PB. Es uno de los mejores lenguajes
de programación que he utilizado. Espero siga mejorando. |
|
| |
Es un exclenete producto lo que
le falta es mayor compatibilidad con las nuevas tecnologias |
|
| |
debería sustentarse bajo algun
standar para la integración con diferentes tecnologías. |
|
| |
Una herramienta muy practica a
la hora de desarrollar aplicaciones. Ademas, provee
maneras eficientes en lo relacionado con los reportes |
|
| |
Seria bueno tener mas apoyo o soporte
en Latino America ojala en colombia |
|
| |
Me gusta el entorno y considero
que mejora con cada versión. |
|
| |
Es una herramienta muy completas,
aunque hay algunos problemas que tuve al momento de
diseñar reportes para formatos preimpresos, utilizando
diferentes impresoras.Las posiciones de cuadre del papel
de una a otra no funciona, deberia respetarse, es decir
en una funciona bien y en otra no. |
|
| |
Es una potente herramienta de desarrollo
para aplicaciones empresariales, sin embargo, nesecita
tener mas flexibilidad para trabajar con controles y
componentes no propios de PowerBuilder. |
|
| |
esta evaluacion es basada en la
version PB 6.5. Seguramente las modificaciones sugeridas
lo tiene versiones superiores. |
|
| |
Creo que se necesita mas acoplamiento
con bd Libre llamece Mysql, Postgres etc. al igual que
con Entorno Linux sin utilizar emuladores. seria excelente |
|
| |
Es muy buen producto y bastante
sencillo de desarrollar , yo opino que es tan o mas
bueno que los productos de Microsoft |
|
| |
EXCELENTE HERRAMIENTA ME GUSTARIA
QUE EL DESARROLLO QUE UNA HAGA FUNCIONE DIRECTAMENTE
EN WEB COMO .NET |
|
| |
QUE NO SE REQUIERA UN GRAN HARDWARE
PARA PODER CORRER SUS APLICACIONES EN NUEVAS VERSIONES.
POR EJM: PARA PODER MIGRAR A VERSIONES TALES COMO LA
10 DEL POWER BUILDER NECESITO UNA PC MINIMO CON XP.
CORRIGANME SI ESTOY EQUIVOCADO,YA Q' MIGRAR SE HACE
MUY PESADO APARTE DE INVERTIR EN EL SOFTWARE HAY QUE
INVERTIR EN LA COMPRA DE NUEVAS PC'S. |
|
| |
Seria bueno que existiera una pagina
para dudas mas amigable que las existentes para compartir
experiencias y problemas del aplicativo........ |
|
| |
Mas información de sus productos
y comparación con otros similares. Mucha gracias. |
|
| |
Como desarrollador encuentro que
Power Builder Independiente de la versión es una excelente
herramienta de programación, en cuanto a mejoras creo
que ya han avanzado enormemente en lo que es entorno
web, pocket, lo que espero a futuro es ya generar aplicaciones
web para ampliar el area de trabajo. |
|
| |
Lamentablemente aqui en Ecuador
la difusión de Power Builder y todo el potencial que
tiene a sido muy malo, motivo por el cual casi nadie
se atreve a invertir en desarrollo con Power Builder,
en lo personal se que es una de las mejores herramientas
con las que he podido trabajar, me gustaría pedir que
haya centros de capacitación certificados o avalados
por Sybase, donde nos ayuden a los programadores a entender
los últimos avanses de power builder, ejemplo yo me
quede estancado en la versión 8, de lo que he podido
leer en los foros han salido muchas mejoras, pero las
cuales por desconocimiento no se las a podido aprovechar,
teniendo que migrar las aplicaciones a lenguajes como
PHP donde se encuentra documentación completa y fácil
de entender |
|
| |
Power builder es una herramienta
excelente, que se ve opacada por la falta de recursos
asignados a su desarrollo y publicidad. J. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder es una herramienta
superior a Visual Basic .Net teniendo en cuenta que
el desarrollo es mucho mas rapido. Se debe impulsar
de manera gratuita o por convenio con las univerisades
y promover las alizanzas con los centros de capacitacion.
Requieren un mercadeo mas agresivo del producto |
|
| |
En realidad PB es excelente , trabajo
ya 9 años y no he tenido mayores inconvenientes . Tengo
4 Sistemas desarrollados, para empresas comerciales,
aduanas, seguros y brokers |
|
| |
Sería interesante que se pudiesen
exportar las DataWindows tal y como se muestran en pantalla
( con subtotales, campos calculados etc.. ) a Excel. |
|
| |
Soy una persona con 35 años en
el medio de desarrollo de aplicaciones, hoy oriento
mis aplicaciones a Internet. Usé PowerBuilder antes
de que iniciaran con la programación orientada objetos
y después use las dos primeras versiones de poo, desafortunadamente
me retiré de la empresa donde se desarrollaba con PB
y no he vuelto a tener contacto con esta herramienta.
Me gustaría reiniciar mis actividades en PB pero la
paquetería y la capacitación salen de mis posibilidades
financieras, así que si tuvieran ustedes alguna facilidad
al respecto me gustaría conocerla. Gracias y saludos.
Arturo Romo. |
|
| |
Creo que es hora de retomar el
marketing, para conocer que aspectos nuevos y mejoras
tienen en productos PowerBuilder y Sybase. |
|
| |
Si bien el leguaje es poderoso
para desarrollo transaccional, seria bueno que implementen
mas sobre controlar el hardware directamente y mas aun
que sea multiplataforma en el caso de linux, por qeu
estamso cambiando algunos servidores a este sistema
operativo, por lo demas es bueno el producto |
|
| |
En lo personal me molesta el hecho
que tengo que utilizar hasta 3 lenguajes de programacion
para la creacion de soluciones web, creo que Power Builder
es un producto muy bueno en el desarrollo de aplicaciones
cliente servidor y se que tambien tiene integracion
para aplicaciones WEB, sin embargo la documentacion
existente es muy confusa o bien no he encontrado una
buena fuente. Para ser un producto de paga creo que
el mantenimiento de la documentacion y la divulgacion
de la misma no es muy buena, es por eso que lo califico
con un 7, como lenguaje me parece excelente, como IDE
le doy un 9, me parece sencilla y facil de usar, algo
que talvez no sea el unico que lo diga es la ayuda es
excelente, talvez piensen que me contradigo con mi comentario
acerca de la documentacion, aclaro un archivo de ayuda
no es lo mismo que una documentacion en forma que indique
las bases con las que hace ciertas cosas un producto.
|
Top |
| |
Aún se comporta inestable. |
|
| |
Es malo que estemos pensando cambiar
de lenguaje solo porque no podemos subir con PWB a internet
sin comprar el EAServer. En los proyectos chicos que
manejamos, es impensable trasladar ese costo a nuestros
clientes. Es el motivo por el cual todavia estamos con
la version 6.5 |
|
| |
agregar frameworks gratuitos para
todas las especialidades. |
|
| |
Power builder es una excelente
herramienta sin embargo creo que le falta un detalle
q lo haria super poderoso y es que faltan objetos para
crear grficos y su utilizacion en mapas por ejemplo;
asi mismo falta mejorar el acbado de los graficos de
barras, lineas, etc |
|
| |
es muy bueno |
|
| |
me hacen falta controles de tipo:
Drill Down, Arbol de Graficos, donde los puedo conseguir |
|
| |
Los felicito la encuenta, |
|
| |
PowerBuilder es una excelente herramienta
pero está perdiendo mercado por descuido en el marketing...
Piensa Sybase mantener a PB en el mercado? o lo va a
dejar de lado? al parecer es la segunda opción... |
|
| |
excelente producto, me gustaría
contar con algún demo de las nuevas versiones. |
|
| |
Las nuevas versiones de Powerbuilder
no estan orientadas hacia aplicativos transaccionales. |
|
| |
Una buena Herramienta |
|
| |
Estamos muy contentos con PB, pero
es muy pobre su funcionalidad para Internet. Tambien
es muy dificil encontrar bibliografia y gente capacitada.
Nos parece que el marketing de Sybase esta funcionando
MUY mal. |
|
| |
Faltan objetos para manipular puertos,
documentos , videos etc. |
|
| |
Es indispensable mantener los drivers
nativos en las nuevas versiones. La interfase ADO es
muy restringida. |
|
| |
PowerBuilder es uha herramienta
de desarrollo muy amigable, sin embargo, a la hora de
buscar información sobre nuevas versiones, me encuentro
casi siempre con muchas restricciones, realmente mi
deseo es migrar este año a una versión de powerbuilder
con sybase(sqlanywhere) |
|
| |
Cuando se utilizan valores numericos
y se efectuan pruebas a modo nativo no se distinguen
problemas, pero cuando se genera el código de máquina
y se ejecuta con este inconveniente el programa se cancela.
Debería efectuarse una observacion cuando se están generando
el código de máquina. Nosotros estamos utilizando la
version 8.0.3 |
|
| |
eXCELENTE HERRAMIENTA, ALGUNAS
COSAS PUEDEN MEJORARSE SOBRE TODO QUE SEA AUN MAS AMIGABLE
PARA ACELERAR EL DESARROLLO. |
|
| |
Que bien saber que powerbuilder
sigue integrando nuevas caracteristicas como la integracion
con .net |
|
| |
PB es una excelente herramienta
de desarrollo, pero pienso qie está perdiendo terreno
en el mercado, ahora hay menos desarrollos en PB y mas
en .NET o Java. |
|
| |
El año pasado fue mi primera experiencia
con PowerBuider, me parece una herramienta potente pero
creo que le falta para llegar a ser a lo que yo estaba
acostumbrado(Delphi), me gustaria que PowerBuilder llegara
a tener mas componentes nativos faciles de utilizar
y con el minimo de código posible. |
|
| |
otras mejoras que muchos esperamos:
1. Las ventanas MDI deben permitir imagenes. 2. Poder
crear los color Backgrounds con degradación. 3. Poder
asignar protección con password a los PSreports 4. Incorporar
muchas funciones de red (Captura de IP, Estado de conexiones,
etc... y que hoy dia solo son posibles con las api functions).
6. Mejorar la estabilidad del producto, ya que es muy
fragil en tiempo de desarrollo y se aborta con mucha
facilidad. |
|
| |
Sería de mucha ayuda pongan en
la internet manuales de Power Builder para desarrollo
de sitios Web |
|
| |
VERSION NUEVA GRACIAS |
|
| |
Power Builder es una herramienta
sensacional, la mayor limitación que he encontrado es
cuando hago reportes graficos, solo se puede hacer un
orden alfabetico, y no se puede jugar mucho con los
colores. |
|
| |
Hagamao que el Power Builder sea
una herramienta de desarrollo en plataforma Internet,
en forma amigable como lo hace en CS |
|
| |
La verdad q me encantaria ver como
power builder se pueda adecuar a las plataformas libres
para ver una mejor operancia del desarrollo |
Top |
| |
Desde que inicie mis labores con
esta herramiente, he tenido una expectativa muy alta,
tanto por sus bondades, medios y técnicas implementadas.
Un punto muy alto es la facilidad y agilidad para desarrollar.
Aunque el punto más bajo para mi es Linux, que aun no
veo que la versión permite desarrollar aplicaciones
que corran en dicha plataforma. |
|
| |
EXCELENTE LA ENCUENTA, MI SUGERENCIA
PARTICULAR ES IMPULSAR POWERBUILDER PARA GENERAR APLICACION
LINUX... |
|
| |
Espero ke mejoren la interfaz IDE,
cada vez la hacen mas complicada. tanta ventanita hace
muy pesado el trabajo, debe de mantenerse esa para los
usuarios ke se han acostumbrado y poderse configurar
como era la PB 6, ke es más ligera para trabajar |
|
| |
CREO QUE ES UNA HERRAMIENTA MUY
PODEROSA, PERO ES MUY DIFICIL DE APRENDER YO EXPLICAR
A ALGUIEN NUEVA. DEBERIAN DE SACAR LIBROS DE APRENDIZAJE
RAPIDO Y CON LAS COSAS MAS ESENCIALES. PIENSO QUE DEBERIA
HABER YA UNA HERRAMIENTA INTEGRADA PARA LA EXPLOTACION
DE LA BASE DE DATOS (REPORTES ESpanishECIFICAMENTE).
SI LA HAY HABER SI ME PUEDEN ENVIAR INFORMACION. |
|
| |
desaria k se pudiese migrar de
la version 6,7 al power builder 10 |
|
| |
PB deberia integrarse con UML o
Java |
|
| |
trabajoa a gusto con esta herramienta
de Power Builder ya que es muy amigable. |
|
| |
Excelente herramienta, pero falta
tutorial con ejemplos más prácticos para utilizar otras
herramientas que se integran con powerbuilder, sobre
todo las herramientas web. O donde puedo obtener esa
información |
|
| |
Mejor integración con opciones
visuales y gráficas |
|
| |
La Compliacion en .Net |
|
| |
Es excelente deben de darle mayor
auge y mas mercadeo. |
|
| |
La herramienta muy buena, pero
para quienes trabajamos con ella, es necesario que exista
una capacitación a nuestro alcance, yo vivo en Ambato
- Ecuador y en nuestra ciudad la capacitacion es nula,
pues los responsables Uniplex que esta en Quito, con
pesimos para como soporte ademas de excesivamente costosos.
Es necesario de suma urgencia que exista otro soporte
en el Ecuador solo asi PowerBuilder y los que trabajamos
con el, vamos a desarrollarnos. |
|
| |
Mejoras del diseño grafico. |
|
| |
Son muy pocas las personas que
utilizamos power builder, puesto de que se desconoce
su potencialidad, ahora aqui en huancayo peru, mucho
mas, el programa PB, para mi, es un mounstruo, es lo
maximo, fijence que no necesita mucho codigo, es mas
click, poco codigo, y realmente soluciona infinidad
de problemas, estoy probando Skins, Agentes, sinceramente
es lo maximo, ahora en cuanto a Web, necesito mas presentacion,
mas utilidad o derrepente me falta explorar, agradecere
se me informe sobre este capitulo, las integraciones
con flash, etc. y si no fuera mucha molestia alguanas
aplicaciones sencillas para incrementar mis conocimientos.
atentamente sergio j. de la cruz zuñiga programador
Av. leoncio prado 1880-chilca huancayo, telefono 064202652-0649600907.
sheckodel@hotmail.com sheckodel@yahoo.es |
|
| |
Creo que debería compartirse código
y componentes nuevos como ocurre con Java para fomentar
el uso de PowerBuilder y asegurar su futuro en mayor
medida. |
|
| |
Excelente herramienta para aplicaciones
clienteservidor, en contraste con el desarrollo de aplicaciones
web. |
|
| |
La versión 9 de PB, creo que es
una muy buena versión, pero no puedo decir los mismo
de la 10, lo cual me preocupa enormmente pensando en
el futuro. |
Top |
| |
Tener enlaces con paginas web,
para ser visualizas los reportes de los proyectos |
|
| |
Deberia haber mas bibliografia
disponible y en interntet cursos que traten temas profundos
y tecnicas de programacion en varias de las versiones
de powerbuilder |
|
| |
Sybase deberia tomar iniciatica
en incorporarse al area de software libre, ideal si
powerbuilder fuese llevado a ese ambiente o que iniciaran
un nuevo pryecto de un nuevo RAD enfocado hacia esa
area. |
|
| |
Trabajo con powerBuilder desde
la version 4 hace 8 años |
|
| |
deseo manuales para desarrollar
poyectos en pb 9.0 gracias |
|
| |
En la pregunta 4, tambien utilizamos
el PB8 y el PB9, pero nuestros clientes más antiguos
tienen aplicaciones en PB6, por eso no es tán fácil
migrar de una aplicación a otra. Ya que en la versión
10.5 se podrá Datawindows Tree view, capacidad de autozise
e integracion con .net procuraremos trabajar nuevos
proyectos en sus ultimas versiones del programa. La
herramienta del Visual Expert 5.6 y Visual Guard son
muy buenos para gestionar los proyectos, gracias a la
exposición que se dió aquí en Perú. Por favor, me gustaría
que me dieran una ayuda sobre la forma de poder enviar
y recibir correo desde el PB8, es importante para un
proyecto. Gracias. |
|
| |
Seria bueno que enfocarán más los
desarrollos de nuevas versiones hacia integración con
el Framework de .NET. |
|
| |
No he podido hacer que los procedimientos
con parametros que tengo en sql me funcionen desde una
aplicación PowerBuilder. En Bogota - Colombia se ofrezcan
mas cursos de PowerBuilder por empresas de capacitacón
reconocidas. |
|
| |
Hace Falta mayor informacion en
español de las actualizaciones |
|
| |
Estoy interesado en Aplicaciones
Web con Power Builder. Sin estar utilizando las famosas
como java, javascript, xsl, php, asp ,, etc |
|
| |
Estaria muy bien mejorar la exportacion
de los datos apartir de los DW's especificamente de
los dw'S COMPOSITE. Mejorar el Manejo de las Funciones
de Fecha y Hora en el PB. Ampliar la capacidad de SubQuerys
permitidos en la DW's. |
|
| |
Bueno, felicitarlos ,ya que sin
ustedes nosotros no podriamos estar bien informardos
y decirles que toda ayuda es bienvenida si se trata
actualizarnos en este mundo global de antemano muchas
gracias por todo. |
|
| |
Desarrollador y admirador de PowerBuilder
desde hace 10 años, por toda su potencia, estabilidad
y versatilidad. Solicito por favor... Desarrollar mejores
campañas de publicidad y dar mayor apertura y mayor
difusion a las capacidades de PowerBuilder para desarrollo
de aplicaciones Web. La gran mayoría de desarrolladores
PB que conozco, por mucha experiencia que se tenga,
no logra ser suficiente para explotar la herramienta
con la tecnología Web. Gracias! |
|
| |
Acceso a más ejemplos de programas
y códigos. |
|
| |
es perfecto lo que ofrece esta
herramienta , ya que es un avance en aplicacion . nos
sentimo honrados al saber que exite tal herramienta
y esperemos que sigan saliendo mas novedades |
Top |
| |
Apertura de drivers para MSSQL
Server Express Edition 2005 y apertura de drivers para
PocketBuilder a otros manejadores, no limitarlo unicamente
a SQL Anywhere. Gracias! |
|
| |
Es indisensable el intercambio
de informacion con otras instituciones por medio de
la WEB, por tal motivo se hace indispensable mejoras
en XML. Saludos. |
|
| |
Que desarrollen productos en español
y que se difundan manuales en linea en español. |
|
| |
Deseamos que la empresa desarrollo
un power builder pero que sea en español para todos
los paises latinos de habla hispana. |
|
| |
Es un lenguaje que permite el desarrollo
de aplicaciones rapidamente y con una flexibilidad y
escalabilidad tremenda. |
|
| |
Que vengan modelos de programación
para una guía mas rápida en el proceso de aprendizaje. |
|
| |
En argentina no obtuve respuesta
de la gente de sybase. de ningun tipo, escribi email
a marketing al administrador y nunca me respondieron.
seria bueno que nos den un poco mas de importancia. |
|
| |
la unica problematica que veo con
Sybase es que no se puede encontrar mucha informacion
de powerbuilder en español, es decir, manuales o libros
de Powerbuilder en español de la versiones o versiones
mas recientes que van saliendo para asi poder estar
a la vanguardia de los cambios y mejoras de dicha herramienta
de desarrollo, otra cosa que veo es que en mi pais El
Salvador Powerbuilder esta perdiendo mercado frente
a Java y a .NET ya que las licencias de powerbuilder
son mucho mas caras que las anteriores. |
|
| |
Deseo que Power Builder Sea mejor
que .Net |
|
| |
PowerBuilder es la mejor herramienta
y espero mucha mas de lo que ya PowerBuilder tiene y
espero tambien ojala una version en español de PowerBuilder |
|
| |
Necesito que herramientas existen
para migrar las aplicacines pb a web |
|
| |
mejorar la interface de desarrollo |
|
| |
espero que salgan mas opciones
de conexiones a las bases de datos, cliente servidor,
scrips |
|
| |
como el pibe todo bien |
|
| |
PowerBuilder 9.0 es una buena herramienta
para desarrollar interfaces para usuarios. |
|
| |
Power builder es el Lenguaje de
programacion que me ha ayudado a realizar mis aplicaciones
mas rapido que cualquier otro. Aparte que es seguro
potente y versatil. He ahorrado tiempo de diseño, lineas
de codigo y tiempo. El datawindow. net me cayo como
del cielo. Yo estaba de pena cuando salio el VS.net,
pero con el datawindow.net mis deños son mas bonitos
y contruyo mis interfaces rapidamente. ademas que la
programacion son pocas lineas de codigo. |
Top |
| |
Power builder me parece una poderosa
herramienta, sus debilidades son aun la integracion
con la web. |
|
| |
Me parece una de las mejores herramientas
de desarrollo, mis expectativas son una integración
con .Net y el manejo de Punteros de Memoria |
|
| |
Tiene mucha potencia en el manejo
de sus datawindow, pero le falta actualizar la potnecia
de porder personalizar sus controles, funciones y demas |
|
| |
PowerBuilder se quedo en el tiempo.
Necesitamos un camino facil para hacer aplicaciones
WEB. No puedo migrar a la 10 porque no tiene compatibilidad
con versiones viejas de windows (w98). Cada vez corre
sobre menos sistemas operativos y menos versiones de
windows. La promocion de Sybase deja mucho que desear.
Sybase Argentina es una verguenza |
|
| |
deseo profundizar en el conocimiento
de powerbuilder, jaguar, ec pero no encuentro info en
castellano. |
|
| |
Necesitamos saber o conocer si
power builder es soportado por linux o cual es su homologo |
|
| |
MUY BIEN LA ENCUESTA , LARGA VIDA
AL POWERBUILDER |
|
| |
Power Builder lo he utilizado por
varios años y me gustaria saber si en Costa Rica ha
representación, y ver si tienen ultimas actualizaciones,
esta encuesta le ayuda a programador a obtener buenos
beneficios y tener una excelente herramienta. |
|
| |
Solo me resta decir que espero
pronto tengan alguna version en español. |
|
| |
me parece una herramienta excelente
sobre tod con el eas, y todo lo que tiene que ver con
bd web, lastima que no hay documentacion como libros
en español de la version 10 ni de EAS. gracias |
|
| |
Pues he trabajado en Power Builder
y me parese excelente espero tener mas noticias de este
Programa ps me es genial todas sus aplicaciones son
exactas, y desde el dia que empese a utilizarlo que
fue la versión 5.0 no he dejado de ulilizarla. Agradecere
mas información del este programa en incluso si van
agregar PowerBuilder.NET. Que bueno ya hacia falta un
programa en linea para los programadores. Saludos .... |
|
| |
Cuando Sysbase ayudara con su site
en español ? Seria interesante encontrar un chat en
linea para intercambiar preguntas y respuesta con diferentes
usuarios de la herramienta de desarrollo y base de datos. |
|
| |
deseo saber si pueden ayudar com
ejemplo s de tallados para poder saber mas de power
builder |
|
| |
seria agradable encontrar más documentación
en español de la version 7 en adelante, son un gran
aporte los ejemplos y ayudas que se encuentran en internet,
pero creo que se necesita más aun. |
|
| |
Facilitar la migración a WEB |
|
| |
HAY MEJORES ALTERNATIVAS EN EL
MERCADO QUE POWER BUILDER. |
|
| |
Se puede construir aplicaciones
web en Power Builder para que se ejecuten sobre el IIS.
Personalmente he trabajado con power builder por 10
años y me parece una excelente herramienta para el desarrollo
rápido, pero lo que se requiere actualmente es trabajar
en aplicaciones web y que el desarrollo también sea
rápido. |
|
| |
Estoy empezando... me parece super
las herramientas q dispones en PW |
|
| |
falta de cursos de capacitacion
auspiciado por sybase para el publico en general |
|
| |
HOLA DESE PROGRAMARA |
|
| |
bueno creo q es una herramienta
fuerte y mas manejable comparando con visual en tosas
su versiones y espero q lo net supere al .net sigan
adelante |
|
| |
se necesita que el producto tenga
un precio menor para desarrolladores junior ... y una
cantidad considerable de funciones para web incorporadas
.. asi como la posibilidad de uso mas extendendido de
.net con ASP PHP como si fuesen objetos de powerbuilder |
|
| |
se necesita que el producto tenga
un precio menor para desarrolladores junior ... y una
cantidad considerable de funciones para web incorporadas
.. asi como la posibilidad de uso mas extendendido de
.net con ASP PHP como si fuesen objetos de powerbuilder |
|
| |
Seria bueno que lanzaran una version
en Español... |
|
| |
Seria conveniente contar con DropDownListBox
que permitan proporcionar de manera opcional un DataWindow
como fuente del listado y por que no, tambien algun
otro control que pudiera tomar como fuente un Datawindow,
tal y como se hace dentro del mismo Datawindow en el
Tab de Edit en el estilo tipo DropDownDW. |
|
| |
TENGO 1 MES DE CONOCER EL POWER
BUILDER 7 |
|
| |
Seria bueno hacer un portal, como
microsoft lo esta haciendo con visual studio 2005 y
dar una certificacion y capacitar gratuitamente en PB
10.00, .NET y 11.00 en un futuro cercano |
|
| |
Me gustaria conocer la forma de
conectividad con SQL Server 2005 |
Top |
Technical documentation
